Publikation

Can the CalproQuest predict a positive Calprotectin test? A prospective diagnostic study

Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review - 21.11.2019

Bereiche
PubMed
DOI
Kontakt

Zitation
Corinne C, Sulz M, Scherz N, Tandjung R, Zahnd N, Rogler G, Rosemann T, Hasler S, Senn O, Vavricka S. Can the CalproQuest predict a positive Calprotectin test? A prospective diagnostic study. PloS one 2019; 14:e0224961.
Art
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review (Englisch)
Zeitschrift
PloS one 2019; 14
Veröffentlichungsdatum
21.11.2019
eISSN (Online)
1932-6203
Seiten
e0224961
Kurzbeschreibung/Zielsetzung

BACKGROUND
Diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in primary care (PC) is challenging and associated with a considerable diagnostic delay. Using a calprotectin test for any PC patient with abdominal complaints would cause significant costs. The 8-item-questionnaire CalproQuest was developed to increase the pre-test probability for a positive Calprotectin. It is a feasible instrument to assess IBD in PC, but has not yet been evaluated in clinical routine. This study, therefore, aimed to validate whether the CalproQuest increases pretest-probability for a positive fecal Calprotectin.

METHODS
Prospective diagnostic trial. The CalproQuest consists of 4 major and 4 minor questions suggestive for IBD. It is considered positive if ≥ 2 major or 1 major and 2 minor criteria are positive. Primary outcome: Sensitivity and specificity of the CalproQuest for Calprotectin levels ≥ 50 μg/g and for positive IBD diagnosis among patients referred to endoscopic evaluation at secondary care level. Secondary finding: Patient-reported diagnostic delay.

RESULTS
156 patients from 7 study centers had a complete CalproQuest and fecal Calprotectin test. The sensitivity and specificity of CalproQuest for Calprotectin ≥ 50 μg/g was 36% and 57%. The sensitivity and specificity of the CalproQuest for positive IBD diagnosis was 37% and 67%. The diagnostic delay was 61 months (SD 125.2).

CONCLUSION
In this prospective diagnostic study, the sensitivity and specificity of CalproQuest for Calprotectin levels ≥ 50 μg/g and positive IBD diagnosis were poor. Additional prospective studies concerning the ideal cut-off values, validity and cost-effectiveness of a combined use with the Calprotectin test in the PC setting are necessary.