Publikation

PTPN2 gene variants are associated with susceptibility to both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis supporting a common genetic disease background

Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review - 21.03.2012

Bereiche
PubMed
DOI

Zitation
Glas J, Czamara D, Diegelmann J, Karbalai N, Ochsenkühn T, Göke B, Steib C, Friedrich M, Stallhofer J, Tillack C, Beigel F, Wetzke M, Olszak T, Seiderer J, Wagner J, Brand S. PTPN2 gene variants are associated with susceptibility to both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis supporting a common genetic disease background. PloS one 2012; 7:e33682.
Art
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review (Englisch)
Zeitschrift
PloS one 2012; 7
Veröffentlichungsdatum
21.03.2012
eISSN (Online)
1932-6203
Seiten
e33682
Kurzbeschreibung/Zielsetzung

BACKGROUND
Genome-wide association studies identified PTPN2 (protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 2) as susceptibility gene for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, the exact role of PTPN2 in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) and its phenotypic effect are unclear. We therefore performed a detailed genotype-phenotype and epistasis analysis of PTPN2 gene variants.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
Genomic DNA from 2131 individuals of Caucasian origin (905 patients with CD, 318 patients with UC, and 908 healthy, unrelated controls) was analyzed for two SNPs in the PTPN2 region (rs2542151, rs7234029) for which associations with IBD were found in previous studies in other cohorts. Our analysis revealed a significant association of PTPN2 SNP rs2542151 with both susceptibility to CD (p = 1.95×10⁻⁵; OR 1.49 [1.34-1.79]) and UC (p = 3.87×10⁻², OR 1.31 [1.02-1.68]). Moreover, PTPN2 SNP rs7234029 demonstrated a significant association with susceptibility to CD (p = 1.30×10⁻³; OR 1.35 [1.13-1.62]) and a trend towards association with UC (p = 7.53×10⁻²; OR 1.26 [0.98-1.62]). Genotype-phenotype analysis revealed an association of PTPN2 SNP rs7234029 with a stricturing disease phenotype (B2) in CD patients (p = 6.62×10⁻³). Epistasis analysis showed weak epistasis between the ATG16L1 SNP rs2241879 and PTPN2 SNP rs2542151 (p = 0.024) in CD and between ATG16L1 SNP rs4663396 and PTPN2 SNP rs7234029 (p = 4.68×10⁻³) in UC. There was no evidence of epistasis between PTPN2 and NOD2 and PTPN2 and IL23R. In silico analysis revealed that the SNP rs7234029 modulates potentially the binding sites of several transcription factors involved in inflammation including GATA-3, NF-κB, C/EBP, and E4BP4.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
Our data confirm the association of PTPN2 variants with susceptibility to both CD and UC, suggesting a common disease pathomechanism for these diseases. Given recent evidence that PTPN2 regulates autophagosome formation in intestinal epithelial cells, the potential link between PTPN2 and ATG16L1 should be further investigated.