Publikation

Impact of Supine versus Prone Positioning on Segmental Lumbar Lordosis in Patients Undergoing ALIF Followed by PSF: A Comparative Study.

Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review - 18.06.2024

Bereiche
PubMed
DOI
Kontakt

Zitation
Sadeghzadeh S, Yoo K, Lopez I, Johnstone T, Schonfeld E, Haider G, Marianayagam N, Stienen M, Veeravagu A. Impact of Supine versus Prone Positioning on Segmental Lumbar Lordosis in Patients Undergoing ALIF Followed by PSF: A Comparative Study. J Clin Med 2024; 13
Art
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review (Englisch)
Zeitschrift
J Clin Med 2024; 13
Veröffentlichungsdatum
18.06.2024
ISSN (Druck)
2077-0383
Kurzbeschreibung/Zielsetzung

: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) play pivotal roles in restoring lumbar lordosis in spinal surgery. There is an ongoing debate between combined single-position surgery and traditional prone-position PSF for optimizing segmental lumbar lordosis. : This retrospective study analyzed 59 patients who underwent ALIF in the supine position followed by PSF in the prone position at a single institution. Cobb angles were measured preoperatively, post-ALIF, and post-PSF using X-ray imaging. One-way repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc analyses with Bonferroni adjustment were employed to compare mean Cobb angles at different time points. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated to assess the magnitude of changes. Sample size calculations were performed to ensure statistical power. : The mean segmental Cobb angle significantly increased from preoperative (32.2 ± 13.8 degrees) to post-ALIF (42.2 ± 14.3 degrees, Cohen's d: -0.71, < 0.0001) and post-PSF (43.6 ± 14.6 degrees, Cohen's d: -0.80, < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between Cobb angles after ALIF and after PSF (Cohen's d: -0.10, = 0.14). The findings remained consistent when Cobb angles were analyzed separately for single-screw and double-screw ALIF constructs. : Both supine ALIF and prone PSF significantly increased segmental lumbar lordosis compared to preoperative measurements. The negligible difference between post-ALIF and post-PSF lordosis suggests that supine ALIF followed by prone PSF can be an effective approach, providing flexibility in surgical positioning without compromising lordosis improvement.