Publikation
GAIN2 trial overall survival with intense versus tailored dose dense chemotherapy in early breast cancer.
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review - 30.07.2024
Möbus Volker, Lück Hans-Joachim, Ladda Ekkehart, Klare Peter, Engels Knut, Schmidt Marcus, Schneeweiss Andreas, Grischke Eva-Maria, Wachsmann Grischa, Forstbauer Helmut, Untch Michael, Marme Frederik, Blohmer Jens-Uwe, Jackisch Christian, Huober Jens, Stickeler Elmar, Reinisch Mattea, Link Theresa, Sinn Bruno Valentin, Janni Wolfgang, Denkert Carsten, Seiler Sabine, Solbach Christine, Schmatloch Sabine, Rey Julia, Loibl Sibylle
Bereiche
PubMed
DOI
Kontakt
Zitation
Art
Zeitschrift
Veröffentlichungsdatum
ISSN (Druck)
Seiten
Kurzbeschreibung/Zielsetzung
GAIN-2 trial evaluated the optimal intense dose-dense (idd) strategy for high-risk early breast cancer. This study reports the secondary endpoints pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS). Patients (n = 2887) were randomized 1:1 between idd epirubicin, nab-paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (iddEnPC) versus leukocyte nadir-based tailored regimen of dose-dense EC and docetaxel (dtEC-dtD) as adjuvant therapy, with neoadjuvant therapy allowed after amendment. At median follow-up of 6.5 years (overall cohort) and 5.7 years (neoadjuvant cohort, N = 593), both regimens showed comparable 5-year OS rates (iddEnPC 90.8%, dtEC-dtD 90.0%, p = 0.320). In the neoadjuvant setting, iddEnPC yielded a higher pCR rate than dtEC-dtD (51.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.045). Patients achieving pCR had significantly improved 5-year iDFS (88.7% vs. 70.1%, HR 0.33, p < 0.001) and OS rates (93.9% vs. 83.1%, HR 0.32, p < 0.001), but OS outcomes were comparable regardless of pCR status. Thus, iddEnPC demonstrates superior pCR rates compared to dtEC-dtD, yet with comparable survival outcomes.