Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly-a retrospective case-control study.

Publikation

Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly-a retrospective case-control study.

Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review - 01.12.2022

Kramer Manuel, Olach Martin, Zdravkovic Vilijam, Manser Melanie, Jost Bernhard, Spross Christian

Zitation

Kramer M, Olach M, Zdravkovic V, Manser M, Jost B, Spross C. Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly-a retrospective case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:1043.

Art

Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review (Englisch)

Zeitschrift

BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23

Veröffentlichungsdatum

01.12.2022

eISSN (Online)

1471-2474

Seiten

1043

Kurzbeschreibung/Zielsetzung

Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in elderly patients was introduced at our institution in 2017. Recent reports have raised concerns about increased rates of early bone resorption at the proximal humerus with uncemented fracture stems. The aim of this study was to find out whether there was any difference in functional or radiographic outcomes between cemented and uncemented RTSA for PHF.