Publikation

A real 3D measurement technique for the tibial slope: differentiation between different articular surfaces and comparison to radiographic slope measurement

Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review - 26.09.2020

Bereiche
PubMed
DOI

Zitation
Hoch A, Jud L, Roth T, Vlachopoulos L, Fürnstahl P, Fucentese S. A real 3D measurement technique for the tibial slope: differentiation between different articular surfaces and comparison to radiographic slope measurement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21:635.
Art
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review (Englisch)
Zeitschrift
BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21
Veröffentlichungsdatum
26.09.2020
eISSN (Online)
1471-2474
Seiten
635
Kurzbeschreibung/Zielsetzung

BACKGROUND
The tibial slope plays an important role in knee surgery. However, standard radiographic measurement techniques have a low reproducibility and do not allow differentiation between medial and lateral articular surfaces. Despite availability of three-dimensional imaging, so far, no real 3D measurement technique was introduced and compared to radiographic measurement, which were the purposes of this study.

METHODS
Computed tomography scans of 54 knees in 51 patients (41 males and 10 females) with a mean age of 46 years (range 22-67 years) were included. A novel 3D measurement technique was applied by two readers to measure the tibial slope of medial and lateral tibial plateau and rim. A statistical analysis was conducted to determine the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the new technique and compare it to a standard radiographic measurement.

RESULTS
The mean 3D tibial slope for the medial plateau and rim was 7.4° and 7.6°, for the lateral plateau and rim 7.5° and 8.1°, respectively. The mean radiographic slope was 6.0°. Statistical analysis showed an ICC between both readers of 0.909, 0.987, 0.918, 0.893, for the 3D measurement of medial plateau, medial rim, lateral plateau and lateral rim, respectively, whereas the radiographic technique showed an ICC of 0.733.

CONCLUSIONS
The proposed novel measurement technique shows a high intraclass agreement and offers an applicable opportunity to assess the tibial slope three-dimensionally. Furthermore, the medial and lateral articular surfaces can be measured separately and one can differentiate the slope from the plateau and from the rim. As three-dimensional planning becomes successively more important, our measurement technique might deliver a useful supplement to the standard radiographic assessment in slope related knee surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III, diagnostic study.