Martin Hüllner
The value of (18) F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in oral cavity cancer patients following surgical reconstruction
Müller J, Hüllner M, Strobel K, Huber G, Burger I, Haerle S. The value of (18) F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in oral cavity cancer patients following surgical reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2015; 125:1861-8.
17.04.2015The value of (18) F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in oral cavity cancer patients following surgical reconstruction
17.04.2015Laryngoscope 2015; 125:1861-8
Müller Julian, Hüllner Martin, Strobel Klaus, Huber Gerhard, Burger Irene A, Haerle Stephan K
Post-treatment surveillance of head and neck cancer: pitfalls in the interpretation of FDG PET-CT/MRI
Meerwein C, Queiroz M, Kollias S, Hüllner M, Veit-Haibach P, Huber G. Post-treatment surveillance of head and neck cancer: pitfalls in the interpretation of FDG PET-CT/MRI. Swiss Med Wkly 2015; 145:w14116.
21.02.2015Post-treatment surveillance of head and neck cancer: pitfalls in the interpretation of FDG PET-CT/MRI
21.02.2015Swiss Med Wkly 2015; 145:w14116
Meerwein Christian Martin, Queiroz Marcelo A, Kollias Spyros, Hüllner Martin, Veit-Haibach Patrick, Huber Gerhard
Contrast-enhanced PET/MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced PET/CT in head and neck cancer: how much MR information is needed?
Kuhn F, Hüllner M, Mader C, Kastrinidis N, Huber G, von Schulthess G, Kollias S, Veit-Haibach P. Contrast-enhanced PET/MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced PET/CT in head and neck cancer: how much MR information is needed?. J Nucl Med 2014; 55:551-8.
03.02.2014Contrast-enhanced PET/MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced PET/CT in head and neck cancer: how much MR information is needed?
03.02.2014J Nucl Med 2014; 55:551-8
Kuhn Felix P, Hüllner Martin, Mader Caecilia E, Kastrinidis Nikos, Huber Gerhard, von Schulthess Gustav K, Kollias Spyros, Veit-Haibach Patrick