Publikation

Prevalence of airflow obstruction in smokers and never-smokers in Switzerland

Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review - 22.04.2010

Bereiche
PubMed
DOI

Zitation
Bridevaux P, Rochat T, Tschopp J, Pons M, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Gerbase M, Frey M, Burdet L, Brutsche M, Braendli O, Felber Dietrich D, Curjuric I, Schindler C, Probst-Hensch N, Russi E. Prevalence of airflow obstruction in smokers and never-smokers in Switzerland. Eur Respir J. 2010; 36:1259-69.
Art
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review (Englisch)
Zeitschrift
Eur Respir J. 2010; 36
Veröffentlichungsdatum
22.04.2010
eISSN (Online)
1399-3003
Seiten
1259-69
Kurzbeschreibung/Zielsetzung

The aim of the present study was to measure age-specific prevalence of airflow obstruction in Switzerland in smokers and never-smokers using pulmonary function tests and respiratory symptoms from 6,126 subjects participating in the Swiss Cohort Study on Air Pollution and Lung Diseases in Adults. The lower limit of normal of the forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio was used to define airflow obstruction. Severity of airflow obstruction was graded according to the recommendations of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Prevalence of airflow obstruction ranged from 2.5% in subjects aged 30-39 yrs to 8.0% in those aged ≥ 70 yrs. In multivariate analysis, age (OR 2.8, ≥ 70 yrs versus 30-39 yrs), smoking (OR 1.8) and asthma (OR 6.7) were associated with airflow obstruction. Never-smokers constituted 29.3% of subjects with airflow obstruction. Never-smokers with airflow obstruction were younger, more likely to be male and reported asthma more frequently than obstructive smokers. Obstructive smokers and never-smokers had similar level of symptoms and quality of life impairment. The prevalence of airflow obstruction in Switzerland is similar to other developed countries. Never-smokers account for a third of the prevalence, which is higher proportion than elsewhere. Airflow obstruction in never-smokers deserves attention because of its frequency and its similar health impact to that in smokers.