Publication

Physiologic [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of floor of mouth muscles in PET/CT imaging: a problem of body position during FDG uptake?

Journal Paper/Review - Feb 20, 2013

Units
PubMed
Doi

Citation
Haerle S, Hany T, Ahmad N, Burger I, Huber G, Schmid D. Physiologic [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of floor of mouth muscles in PET/CT imaging: a problem of body position during FDG uptake?. Cancer Imaging 2013; 13:1-7.
Type
Journal Paper/Review (English)
Journal
Cancer Imaging 2013; 13
Publication Date
Feb 20, 2013
Issn Electronic
1470-7330
Pages
1-7
Brief description/objective

OBJECTIVE
Assess the influence of 2 different patient positions during [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake phase on physiologic FDG accumulation of the floor of mouth (FOM) muscles.

STUDY DESIGN
A prospective study design was used.

METHODS
Two hundred prospectively enrolled patients were included in the study: (a) head and neck cancer (HNC) patients in supine or (b) sitting position, (c) patients with other malignant tumours in supine or (d) sitting position. An intra-individual analysis was done on patients (b) and (d) when such scans were available. Maximum standardized uptake values without correction and corrected for blood pool activity were assessed.

RESULTS
The inter-individual analysis (sitting vs supine) revealed no significant differences (P = 0.17 and P = 0.56). The subgroup analysis on the patients with HNC (P = 0.56 and P = 0.15) and in patients with other malignancies (P = 0.14 and P = 0.08) revealed no significant difference; neither did the intra-individual analysis.

CONCLUSIONS
The supine or sitting position during the uptake phase for FDG-positron emission tomography/computed tomography has no effect on the amount and distribution of physiologic FDG activity in the muscles of the FOM.