Publication

Donor-specific B Cell Memory in Alloimmunized Kidney Transplant Recipients: First Clinical Application of a Novel Method

Journal Paper/Review - Jan 1, 2020

Units
PubMed
Doi

Citation
Wehmeier C, Heidt S, Claas F, Roelen D, Schaub S, Binet F, Langerak-Langerak J, de Vaal Y, Krop J, Karahan G, Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. Donor-specific B Cell Memory in Alloimmunized Kidney Transplant Recipients: First Clinical Application of a Novel Method. Transplantation 2020; 104:1026-1032.
Type
Journal Paper/Review (English)
Journal
Transplantation 2020; 104
Publication Date
Jan 1, 2020
Issn Electronic
1534-6080
Pages
1026-1032
Brief description/objective

BACKGROUND
HLA-specific memory B cells may contribute to the serum HLA antibody pool upon antigen reexposure. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the presence of concurrent donor-specific memory B cell-derived HLA antibodies (DSA-M) in renal allograft recipients with pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) and its association with occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) using a recently developed method.

METHODS
Twenty patients with Luminex single antigen bead (SAB) assay-defined DSA but negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches were enrolled. Plasma samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected at 3 timepoints (pretransplant, mo 6, mo 12). We analyzed IgG-purified and concentrated culture supernatants from polyclonally activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells using SAB assays and compared HLA antibody profiles with same day plasma results.

RESULTS
Plasma SAB analysis revealed 35 DSA in 20 patients pretransplant. DSA-M were detected in 9 of 20 (45%) patients and for 10 of 35 specificities (29%). While median mean fluorescence intensity values of DSA with concurrent DSA-M (5877) were higher than those of DSA without DSA-M (1476), 3 of 6 patients with AMR and low mean fluorescence intensity DSA (<3000) had DSA-M. Overall, pretransplant DSA/DSA-Mpos allograft recipients showed a higher incidence of biopsy-proven (sub)clinical AMR (P = 0.032) and a higher extent (g≥1 + ptc≥1) of microvascular inflammation (67% vs 9%, P = 0.02). In 17 patients (28 DSA) with posttransplant analyses, persisting DSA posttransplant had more often DSA-M (6/12; 50%) than nonpersisting DSA (2/16; 13%).

CONCLUSIONS
Assessment of DSA-M might be a novel tool to supplement serum HLA antibody analysis for pretransplant risk stratification in patients with DSA.