Publication

Magnetic Resonance Arthrographic Findings After Hip Labrum Resection Versus Refixation

Journal Paper/Review - Jul 1, 2021

Units
Keywords
PubMed
Doi
Link
Contact

Citation
Aichmair A, Sutter R, Dietrich T, Dora C, Zingg P. Magnetic Resonance Arthrographic Findings After Hip Labrum Resection Versus Refixation. Orthopedics 2021; 44:e607-e613.
Project
Type
Journal Paper/Review (English)
Journal
Orthopedics 2021; 44
Publication Date
Jul 1, 2021
Issn Print
Issn Electronic
1938-2367
Pages
e607-e613
Publisher
Brief description/objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether new tissue formation occurs after labral debridement/excision, and, if so, which morphological features are typical for a neo-labrum. The authors further compared the findings after labrum resection with those seen after labrum refixation. Patients with femoroacetabular impingement who underwent hip arthroscopy or surgical hip dislocation to address a labrum pathology were retrospectively included, and postoperative magnetic resonance arthrography studies were assessed. Forty-two patients had undergone either labrum resection (n=25) or refixation (n=17), performed arthroscopically (47.6%) or via surgical hip dislocation (52.4%). In the subgroup of patients after debridement/resection, there was anterosuperior/superior scar tissue in 83.5%, with amorphous configuration in 92%, irregular surface in approximately two-thirds of the cases, and a mean±SD thickness of 7.0±2.7 mm. A labrum-like shape of the scar plate was seen in 7.7%. Regarding the subgroup of patients who had undergone labral refixation, an irregular or rounded labrum shape was noted in 26.5% and 51.3% of cases, respectively, with a triangular shape in less than one-fourth of cases. Labrum re-tears (35.7%) were mainly observed at the base (71.7%), rather than within the labral substance (28.4%). New tissue formation can be observed in the majority of cases after excision of the hip labrum, with amorphous and irregular surface configuration compared with a native labrum. This new tissue should therefore be referred to as scar tissue rather than as neo-labrum. Whether scar tissue is inferior to a refixed labrum needs to be further elucidated in follow-up studies. [. 2021;44(4):e607-e613.].