Publication

Distinct topographic-anatomical patterns in primary and secondary brain tumors and their therapeutic potential

Journal Paper/Review - Jul 8, 2020

Units
PubMed
Doi

Citation
Akeret K, Staartjes V, Vasella F, Serra C, Fierstra J, Neidert M, Regli L, Krayenbühl N. Distinct topographic-anatomical patterns in primary and secondary brain tumors and their therapeutic potential. J Neurooncol 2020; 149:73-85.
Type
Journal Paper/Review (English)
Journal
J Neurooncol 2020; 149
Publication Date
Jul 8, 2020
Issn Electronic
1573-7373
Pages
73-85
Brief description/objective

PURPOSE
Understanding the topographic-anatomical patterns of brain tumors has the potential to improve our pathophysiological understanding and may allow for anatomical tailoring of surgery and radiotherapy. This study analyzed topographic-anatomical patterns underlying neuroepithelial tumors, primary CNS lymphoma and metastases.

METHODS
Any histologically confirmed supra- or infratentorial parenchymal neoplasia of one institution over a 4-year period was included. Using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging data, a detailed analysis of the topographic-anatomical tumor features was performed. Differences between neuroepithelial tumors, primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and metastases were assessed using pairwise comparisons adjusted for multiple testing, upon significance of the omnibus test.

RESULTS
Based on image analysis of 648 patients-419 (65%) neuroepithelial tumors, 28 (5%) PCNSL and 201 (31%) metastases-entity-specific topographic-anatomical patterns were identified. Neuroepithelial tumors showed a radial ventriculo-cortical orientation, inconsistent with the current belief of a growth along white matter tracts, whereas the pattern in PCNSL corresponded to a growth along such. Metastases preferentially affected the cortex and subcortical white matter of large arteries' terminal supply areas. This study provides a comprehensive anatomical description of the topography of NT, PCNSL and metastases intended to serve as a topographic reference for clinicians and neuroscientists.

CONCLUSIONS
The identified distinct anatomical patterns provide evidence for a specific interaction between tumor and anatomical structures, following a pathoclitic concept. Understanding differences in their anatomical behavior has the potential to improve our pathophysiological understanding and to tailor therapy of brain tumors.