Publication

Comparison of laser and mercury-arc lamp for the detection of body fluids on different substrates

Journal Paper/Review - Oct 30, 2007

Units
PubMed
Doi

Citation
Seidl S, Hausmann R, Betz P. Comparison of laser and mercury-arc lamp for the detection of body fluids on different substrates. Int J Legal Med 2007; 122:241-4.
Type
Journal Paper/Review (English)
Journal
Int J Legal Med 2007; 122
Publication Date
Oct 30, 2007
Issn Print
0937-9827
Pages
241-4
Brief description/objective

The performance of two detection techniques for body fluids, the Spectra-Physics(R) Revealtrade mark portable forensic laser system and the mercury-arc lamp Lumatec Superlite 400, was evaluated with various biological stains on different substrates. Serial dilutions of neat, 1/10, 1/100 and 1/1,000 using fluid semen, saliva, urine and blood were applied on glazed tiles, glass, PVC, wood, metal, stone, formica, carpet and cotton. Apart from the fact that blood traces were not detectable with the laser, both light sources showed comparable results regarding their detection capability. Clear advantages of the Lumatec Superlite 400, however, are its lower size, weight, purchase costs and the possibility to operate this light source by battery.