Publication

Prognostic Significance of the Myelodysplastic Syndrome-Specific Comorbidity Index (MDS-CI) in Patients with Myelofibrosis: A Retrospective Study.

Journal Paper/Review - Sep 24, 2023

Units
PubMed
Doi
Contact

Citation
Koster K, Messerich N, Volken T, Cogliatti S, Lehmann T, Graf L, Holbro A, Benz R, Demmer I, Jochum W, Rao T, Silzle T. Prognostic Significance of the Myelodysplastic Syndrome-Specific Comorbidity Index (MDS-CI) in Patients with Myelofibrosis: A Retrospective Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15
Type
Journal Paper/Review (English)
Journal
Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15
Publication Date
Sep 24, 2023
Issn Print
2072-6694
Brief description/objective

In myelofibrosis, comorbidities (CMs) add prognostic information independently from the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS). The Myelodysplastic Syndrome-Specific Comorbidity Index (MDS-CI) offers a simple tool for CM assessment as it is calculable after having performed a careful history and physical examination, a small routine chemistry panel (including creatinine and liver enzymes) and a limited set of functional diagnostics. To assess the prognostic impact of the MDS-CI in addition to the DIPSS and the Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System (MIPSS)-70, we performed a retrospective chart review of 70 MF patients who had not received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (primary MF, n = 51; secondary MF, n = 19; median follow-up, 40 months) diagnosed at our institution between 2000 and 2020. Cardiac diseases (23/70) and solid tumors (12/70) were the most common CMs observed at MF diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was significantly influenced by the MDS-CI (median OS MDS-CI low (n = 38): 101 months; MDS-CI intermediate (n = 25): 50 months; and high (n = 7): 8 months; < 0.001). The MDS-CI added prognostic information after inclusion as a categorical variable in a multivariate model together with the dichotomized DIPSS or the dichotomized MIPSS70: MDS-CI high HR 14.64 (95% CI 4.42; 48.48), = 0.0002, and MDS-CI intermediate HR 1.97 (95% CI 0.96; 4.03), = 0.065, and MDS-CI high HR 19.65 (95% CI 4.71; 81.95), < 0.001, and MDS-CI intermediate HR 1.063 (95% CI 0.65; 4.06), = 0.2961, respectively. The analysis of our small and retrospective MF cohort suggests that the MDS-CI represents a useful tool to identify MF patients with an increased vulnerability due to comorbidities. However, analyses of larger cohorts are necessary to define the value of the MDS-CI as a prognostic tool in comparison with other comorbidity indices.