Publication

Impact of precoding on reimbursement in diagnosis-related group systems: Randomized controlled trial

Journal Paper/Review - Nov 7, 2021

Units
PubMed
Doi
Contact

Citation
Tarantino I, Schmied B, Sortino R, Abbassi F, Roeske S, Bock S, Weitzendorfer M, Warschkow R, Widmann B, Steffen T. Impact of precoding on reimbursement in diagnosis-related group systems: Randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg 2021; 96:106173.
Type
Journal Paper/Review (English)
Journal
Int J Surg 2021; 96
Publication Date
Nov 7, 2021
Issn Electronic
1743-9159
Pages
106173
Brief description/objective

BACKGROUND
Complete and correct documentation of diagnosis and procedures is essential for adequate health provider reimbursement in diagnosis-related group (DRG) systems. The objective of this study was to investigate whether daily monitoring and semiautomated proposal optimization of DRG coding (precoding) is associated with higher reimbursement per hospitalization day.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
This parallel-group, unblinded, randomized clinical trial randomized patients 1:1 into intervention (precoding) and control groups. Between June 12 and December 6, 2019 all hospitalized patients (1566 cases) undergoing elective or emergency surgery at the department of surgery in a Swiss hospital were eligible for this study. By random sample selection, cases were assigned to the intervention (precoding) and control groups. The primary outcome was the total reimbursement, divided by the length of stay.

RESULTS
Of the 1205 randomized cases, 1200 (precoding group: 602) remained for intention-to-treat, and 1131 (precoding group: 564) for per-protocol analysis. Precoding increased reimbursement per hospitalization day by 6.5% (160 US dollars; 95% confidence interval 31 to 289; P = 0.015). In a regression analysis patients hospitalized 7 days or longer, precoding increased reimbursement per day by 10.0% (246 US dollars; 95% confidence interval -12 to 504; P = 0.021). More secondary diagnoses (mean [SD]: 5.16 [5.60] vs 4.39 [5.34]; 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 1.39; P = 0.015) and nonsurgical postoperative complications (mean [SD]: 0.68 [1.45] vs 0.45 [1.12]; 0.23; 95% confidence interval 0.08 to 0.38; P = 0.002) were documented by precoding. No associated was observed regarding the length of stay, total reimbursement, or case mix index. The mean (SD) precoding time effort was 37 (27) minutes per case.

CONCLUSION
Physician-led precoding increases DRG-based reimbursement. Precoding is time consuming and should be focused on cases with a longer hospital stay to increase efficiency.